National Green Building Code

When it comes to building projects, this one’s a monster.  The construction zone is essentially the entire country. The builders are a variety of specialists, including architects, plumbers, masons, and lighting, heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning experts.  Since July, they have been meeting in cities – they were in Philadelphia last month – to construct not with bricks and steel beams, but with words.  The goal: a code to guide all development of green commercial buildings in the United States.

The International Green Building Code would, as its name implies, also be available to other countries. But drafting it has been the work of U.S. construction professionals who share a desire for the built environment to incorporate more green features.

Pennsylvania is one of only two states with a government representative on the 28-member drafting body. The other is California, the only state to have a green building code.

The Sustainable Building Technology Committee is an arm of the International Code Council, a Washington association of 50,000 members that develops residential and commercial building codes and standards that states, counties, and municipalities adopt or use as a guide in creating their own.

The Green Building Code would address only commercial development. Last year, the International Code Council and the National Association of Home Builders developed green standards for municipalities and other governing bodies to use for residential construction.

Like most building projects, the green construction code is not expected to be without controversy when the first draft goes public in March for evaluation and input.

“We’ll have early adopters and early supporters, and we’ll have people who are dead set against it,” said Maureen Guttman, Pennsylvania’s representative on the committee. She is executive director of the Governor’s Green Government Council, the state’s sustainability office.

Typically, building codes cover health, safety, and welfare issues to ensure a structure’s reliability for use. A green building code – which Gov. Rendell has called for in Pennsylvania – does the same “from a more global perspective – the health, safety, and welfare of the planet,” Guttman said.

In her view, encouraging so-called higher-performing buildings – those, for instance, that use less water and electricity and more recycled materials – “is a community and ethical obligation.”

“That’s kind of a leap in thinking,” she acknowledged.

It’s the kind of thinking that California, which adopted a completely voluntary green building code in July 2008, is looking to make mandatory. The state’s Building Standards Commission is scheduled to vote Jan. 12 on several proposed mandatory provisions, its executive director, David Walls, said.

Some of the proposals call for reducing indoor water use by 20 percent over conventional construction and cutting construction waste by 50 percent.

The public-comment period on the first draft of the international code will run through next summer, concluding with a hearing in Chicago in August. A revised draft will be considered at hearings in spring 2011 in Dallas, with the code council slated to adopt a final version that year at its annual convention in Phoenix.

In the 1990s, Guttman said, construction requirements resulting from the Americans With Disabilities Act were initially seen as “an enormous challenge.” Now, they are “so ingrained with what we do, nobody talks about it.”

She foresees sustainable-building requirements following the same path, “particularly since it is so clearly shown that to build good, sustainable buildings is good business.”

** From the Philadelphia Inquirer

Contact staff writer Diane Mastrull at 215-854-2466 or dmastrull@phillynews.com.

Federal Tax Credits for Energy Efficiency

If you purchase an energy-efficient product or renewable energy system for your home, you may be eligible for a federal tax credit.  Existing homes and new construction for primary AND secondary homes are eligible for a 30% return on cost with no upper limit.

What the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Means to You:

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 extended many consumer tax incentives originally introduced in the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPACT) and amended in the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (P.L. 110-343).

Department of Energy web site with a full description of the tax credits

Energy Star web site

How will the custom home market change in the next 10 years?

Around the year 500 B.C., the Greek philosopher Heraclitus said, “Nothing endures but change.” Over the centuries his wisdom has proven correct time and again-except, for the most part, in the field of custom home building. True, new developments have taken place in materials science, mechanical systems, and building products, but generally speaking, the way a custom home comes together hasn’t changed much in the past 100 years.

The home building industry has always moved very, very slowly,” says timber-frame guru Tedd Benson of Bensonwood Homes in Walpole, N.H., who for years has been calling on his fellow builders to evolve more quickly.  “Historically, it moved even more slowly.  It was the same for about a thousand years, and then there were many changes at the end of the 19th century and in the first part of the 20th century-mostly concerning the integration of various mechanical systems.”  Custom builders tend to be skeptical of anything new, and with good reason: Plenty of unproven products and techniques have bombed over the years, leaving unhappy homeowners in their wake. “The skepticism is justifiable,” says John Connell, an architect and builder in Warren, Vt. “Builders learn what they know through a slow process of doing it. If they make a mistake, they lose a lot of money.”

How long will the low mortgage rates last?

March 31 loomed for months as the day when the U.S. Treasury would stop purchasing $1.25 trillion worth of mortgage-backed securities and effectively remove a major support to the fragile housing market.

But now that the program has ended, economists interviewed by BUILDER suggest that builders-and others involved in the housing market-don’t need to panic. “This has been so well advertised,” says Scott J. Brown, chief economist for Raymond James & Associates in St. Petersburg, Fla. “Investors have had plenty of time to get used to it. The Fed has been gradually unwinding its liquidity programs. … This is just one more step toward getting back to equilibrium.”

Read More from Builder Online

Inventory of homes for sale shrinks for first time since January

After rising for nine straight months, the number of homes listed for sale fell for the first time in October across many U.S. markets.

The supply of homes available for sale in 26 major metropolitan areas fell by an average 3.3% last month compared to the previous month, the first month-over-month decline since January, according to figures compiled by ZipRealty Inc., a real-estate brokerage firm based in Emeryville, Calif.

Inventory fell on a monthly basis in 22 of those markets. The figures include all single-family homes, condominiums and townhouses listed on local multiple-listing services in markets where the firm operates.

Nationally, inventories typically increase in October as sellers make one last push before the seasonal downturn in sales hits. Zelman & Associates, a research firm, says October listings have typically increased by 0.8% from September over the past 28 years.

Compared to one year ago, the October inventory in the 26 markets covered by ZipRealty was up 13%. Home sales have been at very low levels since buyer tax credits expired in the spring, and that led inventories to pile up this summer.

The decline could reflect the fact that some frustrated sellers are throwing in the towel and deciding to wait until next year in hopes that demand will firm up. Some banks have also stopped selling foreclosed properties in certain states, including Florida, as they take steps to correct document-handling errors.

In Orlando, for example, inventory fell by 6.4% in October, after five straight months of increases. Other large decreases came in Austin, Texas (down 7.6%); Denver (6.5%); and Seattle (6%).

Inventories increased in Southwestern markets, led by Las Vegas (up 3.7%); Tucson, Ariz. (1.7%); Los Angeles (1.6%) and Phoenix (1.4%).

California metros also posted the largest annual increases in housing inventory: San Diego was up 62% for the year, followed by San Francisco, up 53%.

Inventories are down for the year in three Florida markets—Orlando, Jacksonville, Miami—as well as Chicago and Charlotte.

Several cities have seen more than half of all homes listed for sale have had their prices cut at the end of October, including Jacksonville, Phoenix, Chicago, Baltimore, Boston, Tuscon and California’s Orange County.

From http://blogs.wsj.com/developments/2010/11/19/housing-inventory-declines/

Construction costs down 15% – 25%

Times have been tough for homebuilders these days.

Sales have fallen to their lowest level in decades. And the buzz of saws and staccato beat of hammers are sounds seldom heard as production rates drop to lows not seen since World War II.

But developers are benefitting from a little reported side-effect to the housing slump: It’s cheaper now to build a home.

Builders say construction costs are down 15 to 25 percent.

That translates into an average cost of $100,000 to $140,000 for just the “sticks and bricks” (without land) for a modest, 2,000-square-foot house.

That same house cost $140,000 to $190,000 to build during the peak of the housing boom just four years ago.

Builders from Fort Worth’s D.R. Horton to Arizona’s Meritage Homes and Newport Beach’s William Lyon Homes have crowed in recent earnings reports about improved profit margins due to construction cost savings.

The savings could benefit consumers as well when passed on through lower prices, some industry officials say.

But the news isn’t so good if you happen to be a subcontractor or a rank-in-file construction worker.

Thanks to cutthroat competition, these cuts are coming out of their hides.

“It’s supply and demand,” explained Rich Lambros, CEO for the Irvine-based Building Industry Association of Southern California. “When you have a productive housing market, subcontractors are busy. Now, it’s the opposite.”

Subcontractors, industry officials say, have reduced their overhead and streamlined their operations to stay in business.

To survive, the plumbing, framing and roofing firms also have laid off as many as 70 percent of their employees. And the workers still employed have seen pay and benefits slashed.

A lack of work means more subcontractors are bidding for fewer jobs, said Liesel Cooper, president of KB Home’s Arizona division

“You’ve got to worry you’re (not) going to put the subs out of business,” she said.

Mark Swain of DePinho Roofing in Orange said that he’s seen competitors submit bids that were below his company’s direct costs.

“We’ve reacted to the market,” Swain said. “We’ve seen that our competitors have lowered their labor rates, and we’ve done to same to stay competitive.”

Hammer-and-nail types aren’t the only ones affected.

John Hogan, CEO for the engineering and planning firm Hall and Foreman of Tustin, noted that architects, engineers, planners, designers and landscapers all have felt the pressure to get prices down.

Hogan said that during the building boom, builders focused on schedule; price was secondary. Since then, however, the emphasis has been increasingly on price cuts.

To deal with a 75 percent drop in revenue, Hall and Foreman has laid off about half its workers, closed two of its six offices, diversified beyond homebuilding and foregone all fee hikes for five years.

“We have pared down our costs,” Hogan said.

Scott McKernan, president of Joseph Holt Plastering in Corona, said his goal has been to keep his profit margin around 7 or 8 percent after cutting prices by as much as 28 percent.

“I’ve been lucky to get 3 percent (in profits),” McKernan said. “This year, I won’t get any.”

Subcontractors had to do more than cut pay and reduce profits. They’ve had to examine their entire company structure, some said.

Those who have survived the downturn say they’ve learned to be more efficient by doing more up-front planning, closely watching schedules and reducing the time it takes to finish a job. Sophisticated subcontractors keep a close eye on their costs before submitting a bid.

But cuts in labor remain the key element.

Company matches for 401(k) retirement plans have been “suspended.” Employers no longer pay 100 percent of health insurance costs.

And in some cases, hourly wages have been shifted to “piece work” rates, under which workers get paid for the amount of work completed, not the hours worked.

“A typical laborer used to make between $150 and $180 a day,” observed McKernan. “Now (he or she is) making $60. Yeah, it’s sad.”

Builders note that they haven’t gotten much relief from government impact fees and other development charges.

Scott Stowell, chief operating officer for Standard Pacific Homes of Irvine, said that when all the costs of homebuilding are taken into account, “we’re just above break-even on a net basis.”

But homebuilders have benefited from more than construction cost savings. Falling land prices, government tax benefits and staff cutbacks in their own shops all have helped them boost margins lately.

Price drops for materials like lumber and drywall have helped some, but not much, industry officials say. And there have been reports that drywall costs could rise as much as 25 percent in coming months.

Costs for nails have doubled thanks to rising steel prices.

Ganahl Lumber’s purchasing Vice President Pete Meichtry says that overall material costs are down – at best – 5 to 10 percent.

Builders got more benefits by designing smaller, more economical homes, he said.

For example, builders may use 2.5-inch or 3.5-inch baseboard molding instead of four-inch strips. Or they build a straight-forward ridge instead of a more elaborate – and more costly – hip roof. Windows have shrunk by about 10 percent. These changes are subtle, but add up to big savings.

“It’s a combination of things,” Meichtry said. “The customer’s going to get a little less than he was a few years ago, but is not going to notice it.”

From > Builder Online